I keep reading the amazing adventures of journalists entered the story. The book is called "Thirteen giornalsti almost perfect" really the perfect David Randal (Editori Laterza): he took 13 and provided examples of reporters (which has the stares of the reporters, even in "The journalist almost perfect "always Laterza, speaks of those). Basically because, as I understand it, to Randal journalism is nothing more than that, in short, journalism true, I say : Go, see, understand, describe, and possibly do it decently and without cheating. I agree. Since I'm also the "reporter" (kill as many tunes ...) I realized that really is the real way of telling people what happens . See the difference between a fact (as well as a conference, more simply but less fun) and write, and read a statement and writing is so abysmal that no one can doubt. And then, let's face it, there is much more flavor.
back to the point: I told the reporters copies. The story is this: most of them / and has lived a life messy, many have not even done the university, even some high school (we also noted, for the sake of truth, that some of the examples are dated to the end 800) are yet he enter into large newsrooms, to assert their talent (we had them). Well, I always read stories beautiful, seasoned with several lodges scattered-disrupted families, pens last saved in the midst of a war, doors on go go ...). These "myths", which I read at night before as a addrmentarmi tarlucco, make me feel better, I think to feel less "unlucky" less misunderstood. I can do it too-I think-maybe (actually certainly) that talent out there do not measure the I, however, a bit 'of head yes ... Tight
Then I Sevegliano the morning and it seems really all too impossible, I will not make anything, and I'll end up having very proabilmente bitterly accept the decision to change direction, at least to be able to maintain a decent ...
But then, back in the evening ... I get back to reading ... and the courage to leave my dream, I just do not have one.
